Mesh Analysis – Supermesh

Written by

Electrical Circuits, Electrical Circuits Problems, Resistive Circuits

Solve the circuit and find the power of sources:

$V_S=10V$ , $I_S=4 A$ , $R_1=2 \Omega$ , $R_2=6 \Omega$ , $R_3=1 \Omega$ , $R_4=2 \Omega$ .

Solution:
There are three meshes in the circuit. So, we need to assign three mesh currents. It is better to have all the mesh currents loop in the same direction (usually clockwise) to prevent errors when writing out the equations.

A mesh current is the current passing through elements which are not shared by other loops. This is to say that for example the current of the voltage source is $I_1$ , the current of $R_2$ is $I_2$ and so on. But how about elements shared between two meshes? Current of such elements is the algebraic sum of both meshes. For example if we assume the current of $R_1$ is defined with direction from top to bottom, its current would be $I_1-I_2$ . If one assume the inverse direction, i.e. from bottom to top, it would be $I_2-I_1$ .
Now, lets write the equation for mesh of $I_1$ (Mesh I). A mesh equation is in fact a KVL equation using mesh currents. We start from a point and calculate algebraic sum of voltage drops around the loop:
First the voltage source:
$-V_S+...$
Now we have reached $R_1$ from its upper node. So its current is $I_1-I_2$ and we have:
$-V_S+R_1 \times (I_1-I_2) + ...$
One important point that you should remember and it always help you to validate the equation is that the current part for resistors is always equal to the current of the mesh that we are writing the equation for minus the current of the other mesh. Of course this is only valid if you respect the convention to

define all the mesh currents in the same direction
go around the loop at the same direction as the mesh current that you defined while writing the equation

Let’s continue writing the equation. The next element, which is also the last element, is $R_3$ . Without further thinking we can say that the term associated with this element is $R_3 \times (I_1-I_3)$ . (Why?)
$-V_S+R_1 \times (I_1-I_2) + R_3 \times (I_1-I_3)=0$ .
The equation for Mesh I is done. The next mesh is Mesh II. But wait! what is the voltage across the current source to write in the mesh KVL equation? We don’t know. There are two ways to resolve this issue:

A supermesh is a larger loop which has both meshes inside.
Let’s try both methods.
1) Using $V_{I_S}$

Mesh II:
$R_1 \times (I_2-I_1) + R_2 \times (I_2) -V_{I_S}=0$
Note that for $R_1$ , unlike the equation for Mesh I, the current is $I_2-I_1$ . This is because we are walking around the loop with the direction of $I_2$ , or briefly it is because we are writing the equation for mesh of $I_2$ .

Mesh III:
$R_3 \times (I_3-I_1) + V_{I_S} + R_4 \times (I_3) =0$ .

Let’s add two equations:
$R_1 \times (I_2-I_1) + R_2 \times (I_2) -V_{I_S} + R_3 \times (I_3-I_1) + V_{I_S} + R_4 \times (I_3)=0+0$
Simplifying:
$R_1 \times (I_2-I_1) + R_2 \times (I_2) + R_3 \times (I_3-I_1) + R_4 \times (I_3)=0$

2) Supermesh
Here is the supermesh:

Around the loop clockwise:
$R_1 \times (I_2-I_1) + R_2 \times (I_2) + R_4 \times (I_3) + R_3 \times (I_3-I_1)=0$ .
As you can see, we were able to write the equation in one shot. That is why the supermesh method is preferred.

Now, we have two equations: one for Mesh I and one for the supermesh. But there are three unknowns: $I_1$ , $I_2$ and $I_3$ . So we need another equation. The third equation comes from the current source by writing KCL one of its nodes. We choose the node which is not shared by third loop which is the loop at the right hand side for this example. This way we minimize the number of terms in the equation. Note that the current of $R_2$ and $R_4$ are $I_2$ and $I_3$ , respectively, but the terms for $R_2$ and $R_3$ are more complicated because of $I_1$ involvement.
Let’s apply KCL for the right hand side node. $I_2$ and $I_S$ are entering to the node and $I_3$ is leaving.

$-I_2-I_S+I_3=0$

Now we have all three equations:

$\left\{ \begin{array}{l}-V_S+R_1 \times (I_1-I_2) + R_3 \times (I_1-I_3)=0 \\ R_1 \times (I_2-I_1) + R_2 \times (I_2) + R_4 \times (I_3) + R_3 \times (I_3-I_1)=0 \\ -I_2-I_S+I_3=0 \end{array} \right.$

Let’s substitute values:
$V_S=10V$ , $I_S=4 A$ , $R_1=2 \Omega$ , $R_2=6 \Omega$ , $R_3=1 \Omega$ , $R_4=2 \Omega$ .
$\left\{ \begin{array}{l}2(I_1-I_2) + (I_1-I_3)=10 \\ 2 (I_2-I_1) + 6I_2 + 2I_3 + I_3-I_1=0 \\ -I_2+I_3=4 \end{array} \right.$
$\left\{ \begin{array}{l}3I_1-2I_2-I_3=10 \\ -3I_1 + 8I_2 + 3I_3 =0 \\ -I_2+I_3=4 \end{array} \right.$
4.9166
$\left\{ \begin{array}{l}I_1=4.92 A \\I_2=0.25 A \\I_3=4.25 A \end{array} \right.$

The circuit is solved. Any other voltage or current in the circuit can be easily found using mesh currents. To find power of sources, we need current of the voltage source and voltage across the current source.
For the voltage source, current is equal to $I_1$ as it is located at the unshared part of Mesh I. The current is entering from the negative terminal. Therefore, the active sign convention should be used to find the sign of power:
$P_{V_S}=-V_S \times I_1=-49.2 W < 0$ (supplying power).
Take a look here if you are would like to know how power of independent sources should be calculated.

For the current source, the voltage is $V_{I_S}$ and can be calculated by KVL equation of mesh II:

$R_1 \times (I_2-I_1) + R_2 \times (I_2) -V_{I_S}=0$
$V_{I_S}=2 \times (0.25-4.92) + 6 \times 0.25=-7.84 V$

Here, the current is entering from the positive terminal. So, the passive sign convention should be used:
$P_{I_S}=V_{I_S} \times I_S=-7.84 \times 4= -31.36 W < 0$ (supplying power).

Now, it is on you to find the power of all resistors and validate that the power conservation law is satisfied.

Current Source Independent Sources mesh Mesh_Analysis Power power calculation Resistor Source supermesh

Comments

18 responses to “Mesh Analysis – Supermesh”

October 11, 2013

samreen

please send me electrical subjects solved problems about 1000 problems on each subject

Reply
1. February 4, 2014
  
  MD MERAJ ALAM
  
  If you ever get the questions please send me too.
  
  Reply
2. September 14, 2014
  
  SAEED
  
  How we will confirm the path of current in the loop or mesh ( Whether clock-wise or anti clock -wise)
  
  Reply
  1. September 30, 2014
    
    Yaz
    
    We do not need to confirm it. We assume a path and after solving we get the numeric value which can be negative, which is fine.
    
    Reply
3. October 27, 2014
  
  prashanth kumar
  
  yes me too i want more number of prblms to solve them
  
  Reply
February 17, 2014

Bongz

good examples, it really helps coming here. Can you please help me on diodes, bipolar junction transistors, digital electronics and analogue electronics, please:-)

Reply
April 19, 2014

adib

Excellent

Reply
August 24, 2014

akshay

now i am able to understand the concep of mesh 😀 thanks sir it really helpful for me

Reply
September 26, 2014

Joan

its so well explained send some on diodes thanks

Reply
February 1, 2015

B.srikant

thank you sir…

Reply
April 22, 2015

BERHANE

IT IS INTERESTING WEBSITE

Reply
December 11, 2018

Gauri

Now I’m able to understand super mesh analysis 😀tysm

Reply
December 11, 2018

Gauri

Now I’m able to understand super mesh analysis 😀tysm
Well explained

Reply
April 10, 2019

https://www.lanqiuming.com/

This website was… how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I’ve found something which helped me.
Thanks a lot!

Reply
May 18, 2019

John McConnon

I don’t understand why V(is) is positive in Mesh 3 while it is negative in Mesh 2. Shouldn’t the voltage drops across the loop equal the voltage source on the loop?

Reply
June 15, 2020

Rana HAQUE

Nice Example

Reply
June 4, 2021

phonydarkmaster

With the below circuit, mesh current method analysis can be known easily. In the circuit, loop currents I1 and I2 are applied in the clockwise direction

Reply
June 28, 2021

LGR239

For solving the above circuit using mesh analysis, we have three unknown currents, and accordingly, we should form three equations and in addition apply the concept of supermesh analysis.

Reply